A different argument re: what the Arizona shooting means (or DOESN’T) #makesSense

I have to admit,  this is a good argument. (Thanks @Davewiner,  for the link to this article on Slate ( In Defense of Inflamed Rhetoric: The awesome stupidity of the calls to tamp down political speech in the wake of the Giffords shooting.By Jack ShaferPosted Sunday, Jan. 9, 2011, at 12:24 PM ET  http://www.slate.com/id/2280616)

I think Michael Moore had one of the best comments: 

Too unstable, so the Army rejects him. Too unstable, so Pima Com College suspends him. But if he wants 2 buy a gun in AZ, no prob!

from http://twitter.com/#!/MMFlint/statuses/24150692490907648

and Moore also tweeted this:

If a Detroit Muslim put a map on the web w/crosshairs on 20 pols, then 1 of them got shot, where would he b sitting right now? Just asking.

from http://twitter.com/#!/MMFlint/status/24015641061101568

About Theoblogical

I am a Web developer with a background in theology, sociology and communications. I love to read, watch movies, sports, and am looking for authentic church.

One Reply to “A different argument re: what the Arizona shooting means (or DOESN’T) #makesSense”

  1. Pingback: Tweets that mention A different argument re: what the Arizona shooting means (or DOESN’T) #makesSense -- Topsy.com

Leave a Reply