The problem with guys like James Kennedy and Richard Land complaining about “religious freedom” is that one only has to take a look at what this concept means within the ranks of the SBC’s own denomination. “Freedom” goes only as far as the restricted theology they advance as THE theology. Stray from that theology and you soon find out how much “freedom” there is. If it weren’t so sad and so damaging, it would be comical how blind they are to this inconsistency. But their blindness comes from the sin of KNOWING that they are right; in the belief of not the “Inerrance of Scripture”, but the Inerrance of their theology.