@comcastcares yes
@comcastcares yes
@comcastcares yes
@comcastcares the non-HD channel (28) is coming in…so why is the HD channel not available?
@comcastcares Ref code S0a00….channel 1676 is fine…but get this error on 1675
@ComcastCares Nashville Channel 1675…..Reds/ St.Louis game I get this channel. Now says “This channel should be available shortly”
@eco_pres I did take an extended look at the website, and I saw NO SIGN, though, of any concern for THE ECOSYSTEM & its care
Blog post: Climate as “Topic” on Denomination’s Website? It’s more than “Topic”, it’s our Theology: http://t.co/tvWDJW0UGv
So I see this page on UMC.org under “What We Believe” and “UMC Topics” at http://www.umc.org/what-we-believe/united-methodist-topics I scan, see no listing for Climate Change or even Environment. So I click “Ask A Question” and submit this: I am asking this questiuon from the page http://www.umc.org/what-we-believe/united-methodist-topics I want to know if “Climate Change” or “Climate Crisis” is ever going to make this list? Continue Reading
Investors could lose $4.2tn because of climate change, report warns http://t.co/kw9Eqpei7q via The @Guardian
My rely to my last question 2 posts ago: “I hope so. I tend to trust @BillMcKibben & have grown to despise “middle-seeking” ways in media
My prev post’s question comes after being impressed with @Revkin ‘s actually well-balanced (better than “middle”) article on peer review
Wow. @BillMcKibben to Andy @Revkin in 2011 “your relentlessly middle-seeking blog” http://t.co/KecY2H3aaG. Has this changed in 4 yrs?
Notes from a Climate Conference Junkie, Part 1 http://t.co/x2PEKHf7PX by James Long, whom I met at @PandoPopulus and have since spoken with
Articles like this (@Revkin) : what SO MANY pushing “unsettled science” to back skepticism/denial NEED to understand http://t.co/yjrqHXnlQh
Big thank you to Andy @Revkin (HT to @MichaelEMann) for a great article on the Peer Review Process & the pitfalls of premature publishing
“The continued circulation of the non-peer-reviewed draft can act as a kind of pollution of the scientific literature” @KenCaldeira