@ColtsFan254 one of those obvious things to control for. They know such things.

@ColtsFan254 if a doc told you had a disease and that if you didn’t stop doing X, you’d die that you would say “Nah, I got plenty of time”?

@ColtsFan254 that’s why its best to leave such thngs to the appropriate specialists, like we do within medicine

@ColtsFan254 again….I think they know what they’re doing with the science. They know about controlling for natural causes, too.

@ColtsFan254 but the short answer is “yes”, the methodology is not the one used by the scientists

@ColtsFan254 thanks, Ryan

@ColtsFan254 but they don’t have the credentials to know what the data is doing, or they have other motives to obscure or question

.@ColtsFan254 that wasn’t exactly grammatically correct but I couldn’t get it to fit 140

.@ColtsFan254 sure they could, if they apply a drastically inconsistent approach to the science than they do to all other accepted sciences

“As the Pentagon says, climate change is a conflict multiplier.” http://t.co/bPvIEQvLCV // Yeah, the Pentagon, that bastion of liberals!

As the Pentagon says, climate change is a conflict multiplier.” http://t.co/bPvIEQvLCV // Yeah, the Pentagon, that bastion of liberals!

.@MichaelEMann: “it’s become clear to us that in many respects, climate change is unfolding faster than we expected it to” -same article

“dozens of scientists & activists date the rise of the melancholy mood to the failure of the 2009 climate conference” http://t.co/zdm1SrRYpC

“Arctic air temperatures are increasing at twice the rate of the rest of the world” http://t.co/27buoZVaty // “out of sight out of mind”

Blog: Tweaking/Reorienting our theology for the Anthropocene http://t.co/RCZD0ZuPeo #occupytheology