the word made flesh, not Text

Just read a post by  a Wil Ranney, whom  I met and spoke with at the Religious Communicator’s Congress in Chicago in April.  He is writing after reading an CNN piece on Virtual preaching.  I particularly like his closing paragraph:

I believe in the word made flesh. A virtual understanding of God given to us in human from. I believe that the word is still being made flesh. We take those experiences with God where we can get them, whether it’s through a hologram, on a screen, or in person. Who are we to limit God’s ability to work through those mediums. Likewise, there is a trap in becoming too reliant on those mediums to see God. The same can be said about our traditional Sunday worship as well. Life is prayer, an opportunity to witness God breathing into the world around us.

simuality: CNN Article on Virtual Preaching

I comment with this:

Wil,
I believe that online mediums can be and often ARE better encounters than TEXT, and that INCLUDES the Bible. Many of our fundamentalist friends may call me a heretic for that, but I contend that the God story was oral before it was textual (and not a contention that can refuted). I have just started a book called "Desiring the Kingdom" by James K.A. Smith, where he writes about ALL practices (even "secular ones") as value laden and "liturgical", and provides in the intro an unnamed locus of liturgical observance and ritual, which he later reveals as the shopping mall, as the "place of observance" of the cultural values of materialism and capitalism. He argues that these are "liturgical" in that they are formative and that they shape our desires (in this case, as consumers). He goes on to argue that the church has become "propositional"; stressing "ideas" and "worldviews" to the neglect of practices. Thus we have a "Bibliolatry" that downplays other modes and levels of "forming" our desires; what we LIVE out of the habits formed by a worshipping community. I am with you in that the church may well be afraid of the "virtual" and the "simualities" of the Net because it awakens the desires that we have for communion on levels other than that of "intellectual" and "doctrinal".

Dale

July 16, 2010 9:52 AM

 
It’s interesting tome how John 1;1 so often is used to communicate about “the Bible”,  when it obviously is talking about the incarnation in a human named Jesus.  It’s actually,  it seems to me,  a bit of theology that should circumvent the temptation to “textualize” the word.  It seems to be an inheritance of the enlightenment to elevate text to the status of the “ultimate” medium to transmit and express “the word”.  In this sense,  the Internet is an “awakening”;  it is transforming the idea of what text can represent,  and contain in itself linkages to (or “hyper textual”)  other things which can reveal ourselves to one another in a way not previously known

About Theoblogical

I am a Web developer with a background in theology, sociology and communications. I love to read, watch movies, sports, and am looking for authentic church.

Leave a Reply